-
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 52 – Redbridge v HO – level of specificity in section F
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 47 – AT and BT v Barnet - LAs have to provide sufficient explanation for departing from the recommendations of the First-Tier Tribunal
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case law update 46 - Kumar v Hillingdon – entitlements to lawyers at EHCP mediation
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 45 – Derbyshire v EM and DM – no absolute requirement to name a school or institution in section I of EHC Plans’
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 43 - Nottinghamshire v SF – when ‘necessary’ to make an EHC Plan
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 37 – RB v Calderdale – When an EHC needs assessment is required
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 36 – S v Camden – Amendments to EHC Plans
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 35 – Birmingham v KF – School transport can be special educational provision within an EHC Plan in some circumstances
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 34 – B and M v Cheshire East Council – When a local authority can cease to maintain an EHC Plan
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 28 – SB v Herefordshire – Specificity in EHC Plans
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 27 – CB v Birmingham – When an EHC Plan should be made
More -
SEND & inclusion — 1 Jul 2021
Case Law Update 26 – CC v JC – Powered wheelchair can be ‘special educational provision’; Relationship between Section B and Section F of EHC Plans
More